GenAi Reads
More Bartz v. Anthropic and a UK perspective on GenAI's legal landscape in that country.
You’ve likely read several articles or posts about Judge Alsup’s decision in Bartz v. Anthropic. I’ll give you my “non-lawyer” perspective. Next, two attorneys from Finnegan (a U.K. firm) share their insights into the current UK proposals for tackling GenAI. Finally, a sobering reminder of how moms are using ChatGPT.
Bartz v. Anthropic
This recent order may be seen as either shocking or expected, depending on whether you’re a producer or consumer. Judge William Alsup of the US District Court, Northern District of California, issued a Fair Use Order on June 23. While the entire order offers valuable insight into Fair Use arguments, the Order’s Overall Analysis (page 30), followed by Alsup’s Conclusion, gets to the core of the issue. My non-lawyer perspective – it’s not over. His order will influence other jurisdictions even if those courts reach different conclusions. And this is just the initial step in the legal process. Alsup clearly states that this case is heading to trial. But a point he makes is undeniable: “The technology at issue was among the most transformative many of us will see in our lifetimes.” GenAI’s transformative technology will continue to challenge the courts and future legislation.
Mind the Copyright: The UK’s AI and Copyright Conundrum
Finnegan’s Paranavitane and Cole discuss the IPO Consultation on proposed changes to the UK’s copyright law. Apparently, this consultation aims to promote the development of AI models while protecting the rights of authors. That’s a challenging task in any country! If you’re involved in global projects, this UK effort, along with those in the EU and other countries, should not be ignored. The authors remind us that a significant chasm exists between advocates of authors’ rights and government priorities. Dismiss any government’s AI agenda at your own risk.
Overhearing a mom’s conversation
Last week, my wife and I were walking in a park just in time to pass a mom having an animated phone conversation. In the few seconds it took to pass, I heard her say: “I asked ChatGPT if it was appropriate for my 21-year-old son to pay half of his cell phone bill.” (Feel free to provide your own answer for that one.) I didn’t hear the response, but the question alone was both humorous and unsettling. A conversation like this isn’t new to any of us, but it highlights the importance of the Church and the Bible Translation community being at the forefront of GenAI. The world continues to search for answers, and guiding them toward Scripture first is essential. Blessings to each of you as you lead this effort!
Bruce Erickson